Producing enough to have surpluses is not really sustainable. I expect the usual pattern if people do survive post crash is that the population group will again to follow the pattern of rising production and consumption, until overshoot and collapse is reached. Money and trading are part of this pattern of getting to overshoot and collapse.
If a population is to be sustainable, it must really operate at a very low level. I expect that having language is already too advanced. Having tokens for money makes the population even less sustainable. Being able to train dogs to help in finding food is another unsustainable type of activity. We gain too many advantages over other animals, leading to our overshoot and collapse problem. - Gail Tverberg
Friday, July 1, 2016
Surpluses is Not Really Sustainable
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured Post
Dagens demokrati kan ikke redde oss fra klimakrisen
Politikerne tror at løsningen på klimakrisen er å forsterke naturkrisen, ved å grave i filler naturen vår, for å plassere vindkraftverk på h...
-
By Christopher Alexander . Original text at First Things . Rose trellis of Generalife. It has taken me almost fifty years to unde...
-
Norge har den mest fantastiske naturen i verden, ingen tvil om dette, men det er heller ingen tvil om at vi har blitt verdens styggeste folk...
-
Hadde nesten ferdig et hjørne med hulkillister i dag, men så fikk jeg somlet meg til å kappe 2 mm for mye. Da var dagen over og rett hjem og...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.