Published at the P2P-Foundation blog on September 17, 2016.
Gamla stan in Stockholm is the closest you come to a VillageTown in Scandinavia. |
One way out of this quandary would be to substitute the word “activity” for “growth.” A society of human beings can choose different activities that would produce different effects than the techno-industrial model of behavior. They can organize ten-acre farms instead of cell phone game app companies. They can do physical labor instead of watching television. They can build compact walkable towns instead of suburban wastelands (probably even out of the salvaged detritus of those wastelands). They can put on plays, concerts, sing-alongs, and puppet shows instead of Super Bowl halftime shows and Internet porn videos. They can make things of quality by hand instead of stamping out a million things guaranteed to fall apart next week. None of these alt-activities would be classifiable as “growth” in the current mode. In fact, they are consistent with the reality of contraction. And they could produce a workable and satisfying living arrangement. - James Howard Kunstler
The cities will be part of the country; I shall live 30 miles from my office in one direction, under a pine tree; my secretary will live 30 miles away from it too, in the other direction, under another pine tree. We shall both have our own car. We shall use up tires, wear out road surfaces and gears, consume oil and gasoline. All of which will necessitate a great deal of work … enough for all. – Le Corbusier, 1935Ever after this has been the ideal for people around the world, making the car industry the mightiest of industries, reshaping our planet in the image of the car. This ideal was what killed the beautiful Norwegian countryside, the Norwegian culture, my family's farm, my purpose of life and the future of my daughter!
Across the rural northeast, where I live, the countryside is littered with new houses. It was good farmland until recently. On every country road, every unpaved lane, every former cowpath, stand new houses, and each one is somebody’s version of the American Dream. Most are simple raised ranches based on tried-and-true formulas – plans conceived originally in the 1950s, not rethought since then, and sold ten thousand times over.The car industry made us addicted to cars just like the tobacco industry made us addicted to nicotine. No wonder, as both these industries hired Edward Bernays to fulfil their goals. The car industry has done to the countryside what tobacco has done to our lungs, it has become a filthy place where you cannot breath. My family's farm has become suffocated by the suburban dream, making it a wasteland where no rural life can thrive. This place was meant to be a carrier of culture and identity, a guarantor for a living landscape, now all lost to a sub-exurban nightmare!
These housing “products” represent a triumph of mass merchandising over regional building traditions, of salesmanship over civilization. You can be sure the same houses have been built along a highway strip outside Fresno, California, as at the edge of a swamp in Pahokee, Florida, and on the blizzard-blown fringes of St. Cloud, Minnesota. They might be anywhere. The places they stand are just different versions of nowhere, because these houses exist in no specific relation to anything except the road and the power cable. Electric lighting has reduced the windows to lame gestures. Tradition comes prepackaged as screw-on aluminium shutters, vinyl clapboards, perhaps a phony cupola on the roof ridge, or a plastic pediment over the door – tribute, in sad vestiges, to a lost past from which nearly all connections have been severed. There they sit on their one- or two- or half-acre parcels of land – the scruffy lawns littered with the jetsam of a consumerist religion (broken tricycles, junk cars, torn plastic wading pools) – these dwellings of a proud and sovereign people. If the ordinary house of our time seems like a joke, remember that it expresses the spirit of our age. The question, then, is: what kind of joke represents the spirit of our age? And the answer is: a joke on ourselves. – James Howard Kunstler, “The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America's (and Norway's) Man-Made Landscape”, page 166
In America, with its superabundance of cheap land, simple property laws, social mobility, mania for profit, zest for practical invention, and Bible-drunk sense of history, the yearning to escape industrialism expressed itself as a renewed search for Eden. America reinvented that paradise, described so briefly and vaguely in the book of genesis, called it Suburbia, and put it for sale. – James Howard Kunstler, “The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America's (and Norway's) Man-Made Landscape”, page 37Suburban houses are not homes, they are bunkers, and for anybody to survive in them they are depended upon a heavy infrastructure destroying the landscape.
It's a figure that ought to send chills up the spine of a reflective person because these housing starts do not represent newly minted towns, or anything describable as real or coherent communities. Rather, they represent monoculture tract developments of cookie cut bunkers on half acre lots in far-flung suburbs, or else houses plopped down in isolation along country roads in what had been cornfields, pastures, or woods. In any case, one can rest assured that they will only add to the problems of our present economy and the American (Norwegian) civilization. They will relate poorly to other things around them, they will eat up more countryside, and they will increase the public fiscal burden. – James Howard Kunstler, “The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America's (and Norway's) Man-Made Landscape”, page 147These days the suburban burden of my family's farm is taking on weight again, digging tons of plastic deep into the ground and putting a rather large pump house where the barn used to be. All in service for the subexurbanites and their miserable, pointless lives!
This cannot go on anymore! The cars should be reserved for farmers, as originally was the intention of Henry Ford. Let the countryside be rural for rural people, and the towns to be urban for urban people. Suburbanites, exurbanites and subexurbanites, go home to where you belong, in town!
Of course, we cannot store these poor people in vertical suburbs, as was the idea of Le Corbusier. We must give them real urbanism, we must give them Village Towns!
Let's face it, Plan A (automobile-based suburban sprawl) is not working anymore. We need a Plan B.
We call it VillageTown.
Read more:
Sighisoara, one of few walled towns still inhabited, but with cars:-/
"Nobody should have to own a car, just to participate in society." - Not Just Bikes
Poor my wife living in Øverskreien! This is extreme subexurbania, worse than Houston! No rural culture left, and no urban culture left at Skreia!
"Living in the city you have all the convenience and none of the space, living in the country, you have all of the space and none of the convenience. In the suburbs, you get neither." - Cap'n Snackbeard
Here at our ancestors ancient farm, the mill meadow Grythengen, we have neither convenience or space anymore, it's all destroyed, made into a disgusted technical cabinet, to support the disgusted lives of the subexurbanites surrounding our farm. And with this the stony river Grýta ceased to be a cultural river, and the Western Christian Civilization collapsed.
Only anomic, oikofobic zombies and the Lake Mjøsa Barbarians inhabit this glorious landscape of our brave forefathers now!!!!!
Totscana is now a placeless anti-place:-/
"I remember when in my hometown (tiny little place, about a thousand people), they tore down a historical (and I mean over one hundred years old) building that used to be a drug store and ice cream parlor, and replaced it with a gas station ...when we already had a failing gas station just down the road that they could have bought and redone. We aren't even near a damn interstate!
Instead of allowing that century-old building to continue to exist and remain a testament to the town's history, it was instead destroyed and replaced by the most humiliating monument to American modernization that I've ever seen. As far as I know, only a brick remains from that building and I keep it in my room for keepsake. Shit sucks, man." - mrjtg12
Instead of allowing our century-old mill meadow Grythengen to continue to exist and remain a testament to our hamlets' and river's history, it was instead destroyed and replaced by some of the most humiliating monuments to American modernization that I've ever seen.
- Village towns
- Wendell Berry And The New Urbanism: Agrarian Remedies, Urban Prospects
- A Pattern Language Conference in the Sustainable Valley of Hurdal in 2017?
- Nathan Lewis: People Who are Not Directly Involved in Agriculture Should Live in Urban Places
- Why the American way of life is negotiable: the coming transport revolution
- Store mengder kjemikalier på avveie langs norske veier
- ‘BEST TOURISM VILLAGES’ OF 2022 NAMED BY UNWTO
- Arkitekturopprøret med Saher Sourouri: lenge etterlengtet - podcast
- Giitu
Meget betimelig artikkel i VL i dag!
ReplyDelete- Kjør derfor ut:
http://www.vl.no/reportasjer/reportasje/kjor-derfor-ut-1.782110
Fra artikkelen:
"Den handler om at vi i ettertidskrigen har skapt et samfunn på bilens premisser. De gamle offentlige møteplassene er blitt erstattet av kjøpesentre og næringsparker. Et demokratisk problem, mener noen, fordi du ikke kan delta i dette fellesskapet uten å ha tilgang på bil."
Dette ønsker VillageTowns å snu på hodet!
Ps! Ikke glem å ønske deg gavekort til jul for boka til Ronny Spaans, "Kjøpesenterlandet", som kommer i januar 2017 på Dreyers forlag.
Om boka:
"Noreg har eit ekstremt forhold til kjøpesenter. Vi har det største talet kjøpesenterkvadratmeter per innbyggjar i Europa. Fordelar vi talet kvadratmeter til innbyggjarane i landet, vil kvar innbyggjar få nesten éin kvadratmeter kvar. Nestemann på lista, Sverige, har halvparten så mange kjøpesenterkvadratmeter som oss. Samtidig er vi det landet med fleste bilbaserte kjøpesenter utanfor bysentrum. Det samla salsarealet til kjøpesenter i Noreg har i tillegg nærast dobla seg på ti år. Ein vedvarande katastrofe, kallar ekspertar denne trenden, for kjøpesenterutviklinga fremjar bilbruk og hindrar mjuke trafikantar og kollektivtrafikk.
Journalist og forfattar Ronny Spaans har besøkt 34 byar og bygdebyar teke denne utvikling på pulsen. Han har òg undersøkt andre trendar i stadutviklinga som skaper debatt: utbygging av kulturhus og sjøsider.
Noreg er i ein av dei største arkitektoniske omformingsprosessane i historia. Diskusjon om fjordbyen Oslo har vore framme i riksmedium. Men debatten om stadutvikling på mindre stader har det vore stilt om. Ikkje eingong utviklinga av den nye bydelen i Trondheim, Brattøra, har vore diskusjonstema.
Denne boka går inn på desse trendane og viser at det er all grunn rope varsku, for utviklinga gjer noko med Noreg. Vi er i ferd med å misse den tradisjonelle norske bygdebyen, slik vi kjenner han – ei samling av småskala, intime trehusgater."
En god oppfølger til Kunstlers bok "The Geography of Nowhere"!
- Bilene endrer byene i Kina:
ReplyDeletehttp://forskning.no/2016/09/biler-og-byer-kina/produsert-og-finansiert-av/universitetet-i-oslo
"Som fremveksten av bilkultur har vist oss gjennom historien, endrer bilen landskap radikalt.
En enorm infrastruktur trengs for å støtte opp om et samfunn sentrert rundt motoriserte kjøretøy. Ikke bare er det behov for steder for å fylle drivstoff på biler, steder for å kjøpe og reparere biler – det må også være plass til å kjøre dem og steder å parkere dem.
Beth E. Notar er antropolog med fokus på Kina ved Trinity College i Hartford, USA. I flere år har hun forsket på hva det vil si for et samfunn å gå fra å være dominert av gåing, sykling og bruk av offentlig transport til å bli et samfunn dominert av personbiler. Hun legger vekt på den store omstrukteringen byene har gjennomgått:
– Bygater i Kina har blitt bygget om for å legge til rette for biltrafikk. De fleste gamle bysentrene i kinesiske byer har blitt revet og bygget om for å lage hovedveier, ringveier og broer, sier Notar.
– Denne utviklingen har man sett til andre tider og steder i verden, men farten og skalaen dette har blitt endret på i kinesiske storbyer er uten sidestykke."
- Folk må gidde å gå til bussen:
ReplyDeletehttp://forskning.no/2016/11/kollektivreisende-er-ogsa-fotgjengere/produsert-og-finansiert-av/universitetet-i-stavanger
"Resultatene viser at når vi går langs interessante fasader med butikker, trær og grøntareal og steder der det er mange andre folk, virker distansen kortere.
Når vi må vente for å krysse veien i forurenset luft blant store kjedelige bygninger, opplever vi at distansen er lengre.
Ifølge Hillnhütter kan den distansen vi mener det er greit å gå til en holdeplass variere med hele 70 prosent.
– Når folk er villige til å gå lengre i attraktive urbane områder, betyr det at kundegrunnlaget kan mer enn dobles, uten at man endrer kollektivinfrastrukturen, sier han."