Skip to main content

From Stone Desert to Glass Desert

The new proposal for bringing "life" back to the area around Oslo Central Station

No doubth, my politicians and our architects are still stuck in a heroic city-destroying mode, destroying my beloved nation's capital city.

Jeg vil sitere en ypperlig leserkommentar til dette prosjektet:
Steinørken blir glassørken...Hva er det som er så utrolig stas med høyhus, er det et New York-kompleks? Høyhus er så gammaldags. Nå har vi nettopp fått opp barcode, i revidert utgave. Så skal det bli kamp om hvor høyt dette skal bli...Høyhus stjeler enormt med lys og er det noe vi ikke har overskudd av i Norge, så er det lys. Vi kan ikke fornye byen for å danke ut andre byer. Oslo skal fornyes for de som bor der og jobber der. Hver dag, hele året. Ikke for de som kommer innom. - Pelikan
The article in Aftenposten about this life destroying project, one out of a long list of new city destroying projects to be forced upon central Oslo and its sea side, is to be found here.

Where is The Salingaros Group? Please save my capital!

Updates:
Other plans for downtown Oslo:
Other related articles about downtown Oslo:
 Further reading:

Comments

  1. Hi Øyvind, the Salingaros Group is here, and you are to be contacted soon by Massimo Locci, representing the Group and the International Society of Biourbanism in Northern Europe.

    Well... we are not Superman, but we would be happy to do the possible with you. Please, give Massimo all the informations you have about what's going on, and let's discuss together how we can help Oslo's people.

    Best,

    Stefano Serafini

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have to ask you Øyvind, what on earth are they destroying? Deserted city streets like Schweigaardsgate? The fabulous drug quarter of Trafikkanten? Or perhaps the fact that we are now trying to change the things we did wrong in the 80s and 90s like Galleri Oslo, Postterminalen and all the other massive buildings around the central station that doesn`t give the area any charm scares you? This area doesn`t represent any history or architecture that people in Oslo want to be associated, so why cant they change it for the better? If we are going to have space for all the new people coming to this city every year we need a lot of apartments, offices and commercial areas. In that context I rather want the buildings to be slim and tall with life around them, than massive and low and no life and light around.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh, that's sound familiar.... It looks like the post of a Real Estate Company, ore the comment of an Italian Minister who wanted to "bring life" (sic) to our Naturalistic National Parks, by putting commercial centres in them.

    Probably the same kind of rethorics that the same kind of people told, before building in the 80s and 90s.

    Ola, do you really think that steel-and-glass architecture will help to solve the existing problems of European cities?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kapping av hulkillist

Hadde nesten ferdig et hjørne med hulkillister i dag, men så fikk jeg somlet meg til å kappe 2 mm for mye. Da var dagen over og rett hjem og helga ødelagt! Men får tro jeg får en ny dag i mårå? Har funnet litt på nett, så går på med fornyet optimisme over helga. Får trøste meg med at skal man bli god i noe må man minst holde på 10.000 timer.




En god artikkel:
5 snarveier når du skal legge lister
En kommentar: Kort sagt må man tenke motsatt når man lister med hulkil. Se for deg at du legger lista feil vei (den som peker mot/tar i taket) legger du jevnt med underlaget på sagen. Den delen som skal på veggen legger du på anlegget/landet på sagen.  Skjær den første vinkelen du trenger. Så maler du deg ut ifra den, setter merke på den delen som ligger på anlegget/landet på sagen, vrir saga til den vinkelen du skal ha... skjærer forsiktig litt og litt av til du treffer streken...

Så bare til å montere :)

Lite tips er å kappe hulkil lister 1-2 mm for kort, slik at du har litt plass å bevege lis…

Tårevandringer III

The original form of Anglo-American conservatism, that of Edmund Burke, explains why the current situation is bad and why we should have avoided it. It tells us that society is extremely complex, it can’t be designed or reduced to a single principle like equal freedom, and it takes a long time to evolve, so if you have a reasonably functional society you shouldn’t wreck it, and if you’ve unsettled an inherited social order you should step back and do what you can so it can re-establish itself. It’s hard to see how any of that can apply in an age of institutionalized revolution symbolized, for example, by an ever more radical and sacralized principle of inclusiveness. - James Kalb- Why Liberal Governing Elites Seek to Neutralize Social Issues

Selv orker jeg ikke lenger å leve mitt liv begrenset til den sosiale kontrakt, det burde være klart for alle nå at vi kan ikke leve sammen slik, og at vi må reetablere husmannstroens kontrakt, den Klaus, Even Helmer og Johan Albert hadde som fund…

From Ideology to Technology

Michael Mehaffy and Nikos Salingaros are running a series of essays in Metropolis Magazine at the moment, they are all published here. I’ve no idea how long the series will run — hopefully forever. Anyway, it’s time to introduce this series to permaculture people, and I’ll be concentrating on the first five essays about the technologies of Christopher Alexander.

The essays on Alexander’s technologies in chronological order:
The Radical Technology of Christopher AlexanderThe Sustainable Technology of Christopher AlexanderThe Pattern Technology of Christopher AlexanderThe Living Technology of Christopher AlexanderThe “Wholeness-Generating” Technology of Christopher Alexander
The 20th century was the century of ideologies, but it all ended in mindless consumerism. So obviously, ideologies alone are not the answer, although they can hold many a truth and be a tool to unite people behind a common endeavour. Still, all this is pointless if the people do not have the right tools, or even worse…