Skip to main content

GENERATIVE CODES HAVE EVOLVED FROM PATTERN LANGUAGES, BUT ARE MUCH MORE SOPHISTICATED GENERATING SYSTEMS

By Christopher Alexander. Original post here. Published at P2P-Foundation on 6th April 2015.

A generative code is a system of unfolding steps that enable people in a community to create a wholesome and healthy neighborhood. The steps are governed by rules of unfolding that are not rigid, but depend on context, and on what came before. The rules work in a way that is similar to the rules that nature follows to unfold an organism or a natural landscape, much as genetic codes unfold embryos. But these rules unfold a neighborhood and its buildings from the whole, and lead to a unique result for each particular place.The rules tell you how to take specific steps, in a certain way that allows unfolding to proceed.

  • Like patterns (identified in A Pattern Language, 1975), the rules cover a great range of scales — all of the major features of the neighborhood, down to the finer details, including open spaces, buildings, connecting paths, rooms, window sills, etc. 
  • The rules are ordered – sequenced – to unfold each part of the environment being created, smoothly and coherently. 
  • Also, in the generative code, each rule is specifically tied to a certain group of individuals, whose job it is to undertake that part of the unfolding together. 
  • Finally, in order to make the process succeed, the overall operation of the unfolding, which goes forward step by step, is accompanied by a general set of practical specifications for the conditions governing land tenure, cash flow, and human organization, and the community in which the process is being carried out.

When a generative code is used, the order in which things are done plays a decisive role in proper execution of the unfolding process.

For example:
  • Diagnosis of the site is an essential early step. 
  • Roads and driveways must be located and built after the pedestrian structure, not before. 
  • Roads must be located and built after the houses, not before. 
  • Sewers must be located and laid after public space is created, not before. 
  • When houses are designed, the garden must be placed (located) before the house volume is located, not after. 
  • Construction work must begin long before final drawings are ready, and the drawings develop, in parallel with the construction process. 
  • Windows must be placed, designed, and measured and built, after the walls or wall framing has begun, so that they reflect the real situations in the room, its light, and view. 
  • According to contract, changes of design which have no effect on quantity of units built, must not be viewed as change orders, but as part of the builders obligation, provided they stay within parameters of quantity and price.

In an unfolding sequence, these things occur in this unusual order, not in the order we might expect from conventional contemporary building methods. This is because each activity is unfolding from the wholeness of the place. The changes of sequence are not whimsical, but necessary, to make sure that each thing can be adapted to the whole, in a successful fashion. They are necessary, in order to allow a coherent unfolding, of the neighborhood, where the right things come first, and the lesser ones take their place in the context provided by the major things. The “right” things, are the ones which have the biggest impact on the environment from a human and emotional point of view, which is capable of making people healthy because their deepest feelings are respected.

FOOTNOTE

In order to see the contrast, here is the order in which these things were usually done in conventional 20th-century development work, many of them specified in existing city codes. In current practice, there are many conventions of sequence, which have become part of the accepted wisdom, in planning, architecture, and development.

The following examples are all harmful:
  • Conventionally: Roads are built before the buildings they serve. 
  • Conventionally: In a tract development, street sewers are laid long before the houses are built. 
  • Conventionally: Houses are placed, and the garden is whatever is left on the lot, comes second. 
  • Conventionally: Windows are designed and positioned at the time the building’s plans are submitted for plan check. 
  • Conventionally: Drawings are completed before any construction work is done. 
  • Conventionally: Neighborhood plans are completed, before any construction work is done. 
  • Conventionally: Public spaces are designed after individual buildings. 
  • Conventionally: Changes are done by change orders, and therefore become very expensive.
These practices do not support the creation of living neighborhoods.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kapping av hulkillist

Hadde nesten ferdig et hjørne med hulkillister i dag, men så fikk jeg somlet meg til å kappe 2 mm for mye. Da var dagen over og rett hjem og helga ødelagt! Men får tro jeg får en ny dag i mårå? Har funnet litt på nett, så går på med fornyet optimisme over helga. Får trøste meg med at skal man bli god i noe må man minst holde på 10.000 timer.




En god artikkel:
5 snarveier når du skal legge lister
En kommentar: Kort sagt må man tenke motsatt når man lister med hulkil. Se for deg at du legger lista feil vei (den som peker mot/tar i taket) legger du jevnt med underlaget på sagen. Den delen som skal på veggen legger du på anlegget/landet på sagen.  Skjær den første vinkelen du trenger. Så maler du deg ut ifra den, setter merke på den delen som ligger på anlegget/landet på sagen, vrir saga til den vinkelen du skal ha... skjærer forsiktig litt og litt av til du treffer streken...

Så bare til å montere :)

Lite tips er å kappe hulkil lister 1-2 mm for kort, slik at du har litt plass å bevege lis…

Tårevandringer III

The original form of Anglo-American conservatism, that of Edmund Burke, explains why the current situation is bad and why we should have avoided it. It tells us that society is extremely complex, it can’t be designed or reduced to a single principle like equal freedom, and it takes a long time to evolve, so if you have a reasonably functional society you shouldn’t wreck it, and if you’ve unsettled an inherited social order you should step back and do what you can so it can re-establish itself. It’s hard to see how any of that can apply in an age of institutionalized revolution symbolized, for example, by an ever more radical and sacralized principle of inclusiveness. - James Kalb- Why Liberal Governing Elites Seek to Neutralize Social Issues

Selv orker jeg ikke lenger å leve mitt liv begrenset til den sosiale kontrakt, det burde være klart for alle nå at vi kan ikke leve sammen slik, og at vi må reetablere husmannstroens kontrakt, den Klaus, Even Helmer og Johan Albert hadde som fund…

From Ideology to Technology

Michael Mehaffy and Nikos Salingaros are running a series of essays in Metropolis Magazine at the moment, they are all published here. I’ve no idea how long the series will run — hopefully forever. Anyway, it’s time to introduce this series to permaculture people, and I’ll be concentrating on the first five essays about the technologies of Christopher Alexander.

The essays on Alexander’s technologies in chronological order:
The Radical Technology of Christopher AlexanderThe Sustainable Technology of Christopher AlexanderThe Pattern Technology of Christopher AlexanderThe Living Technology of Christopher AlexanderThe “Wholeness-Generating” Technology of Christopher Alexander
The 20th century was the century of ideologies, but it all ended in mindless consumerism. So obviously, ideologies alone are not the answer, although they can hold many a truth and be a tool to unite people behind a common endeavour. Still, all this is pointless if the people do not have the right tools, or even worse…