To economists, there’s no distinction between money spent on Stuff that makes life better and money spent on Stuff that makes life worse. GDP treats both the same. If GDP goes up, we’re told we’re golden—even though it doesn’t actually tell us a thing about how we’re really doing as a society. In what I call the ‘Game of More’, politicians cheer a steadily growing economy at the same time as our health indicators are worsening, income inequality is growing and polar icecaps are melting.
But what if we changed the point of the game? What if the goal of our economy wasn’t more, but better—better health, better jobs and a better chance to survive on the planet? Shouldn’t that be what winning means? - Annie Leonard
We Can Build Compact Walkable Towns Instead of Suburban Wastelands
Sunday, October 6, 2013
It’s Time to Replace More with Better
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured Post
Dagens demokrati kan ikke redde oss fra klimakrisen
Politikerne tror at løsningen på klimakrisen er å forsterke naturkrisen, ved å grave i filler naturen vår, for å plassere vindkraftverk på h...
-
By Christopher Alexander . Original text at First Things . Rose trellis of Generalife. It has taken me almost fifty years to unde...
-
From the PLANETIZEN May 24, 2010 Nikos Salingaros presents the case for demolishing a modernist eyesore in Rome and replacing it with a ...
-
Stupetårnet i Engelandsvika må nok sies å være det flotteste bygget i Gjøvik i dette årtusenet. Diving tower from Lake Mjøsa by the town of ...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.