Skip to main content

Nu växer motståndet mot den modernistiska byggstilen

Vi går just nu mot ett paradigmskifte där de mjuka värdena håller på att göra comeback i stadsbilden.

”Kanske är framtidens arkitektur den som inte bara tillgodoser människans grundläggande funktionella behov, utan även tillfredsställer våra psykologiska och känslomässiga anspråk. Det verkar trots allt finnas goda incitament för att låta de mjuka värdena och naturliga värdena få plats även i den mänskligt skapade miljön.”

Läs hela artikeln här.

Fremdeles er jeg Totens eneste myke mann og alene om å kjempe for de myke verdier. På Toten liker man ikke hygge, og for å understreke sin harde linje har man valgt å plassere denne iskalde kvasifunkisblokka midt i kommunesenteret, midt på Toten, midt på den gamle meieritomta, hvor en av Totens mykeste bygninger lå. Nei, noe slikt kunne ikke beinharde totninger utstå!

-Wikimedia.



James Stevens Curl's book "Making Dystopia" sits at the top of a genre with a long pedigree: the exposure of the catastrophe of modern architecture. A very early example is Henry Hope Reed's "The Golden City" (1959), which simply placed pictures of modern architecture next to pictures of the traditional buildings it replaced. It was a knock-down punch that would have done in any industry not supported by the kind of deceit that upheld Nazi Germany - where modernism's founders learned their promotional techniques. The author has the relationship between the Nazis and the modernists down cold. The facts have been kept in dark closets for many years by a design clerisy afraid of their implications. Stevens Curl lets a thousand cats out of a thousand bags. It is not pretty, but it is fascinating as the solution to a mystery that has held the world in thrall for way too long.

Le Corbusier planned to demolish much of Paris to make way for his brutal skyscrapers, and held a top planning post with the Nazis' Vichy collaborators in France. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe tried to get Hitler to embrace modernism as the design template of the Third Reich. Walter Gropius founded the Bauhaus and brought the modernist virus to the United States. He was handed the leadership of Harvard's school of architecture on a platter, and he spread the poison to almost every architecture school in America and abroad. Stevens Curl focuses on uncovering the misdeeds of these charlatans, but there is so much more in his indictment.

The founders' totalitarian experiment was exported to the United States before the war but it took hold only afterward. The long-established dominance of traditional architecture ended with a whimper. Stevens Curl has the hard facts and citations to demonstrate how this came down. He describes how modern architecture was shifted from a niche design conceit reeking of communism before WWII to a symbol of democracy after WWII and used to belabor the Soviets. At the same time, he shows how traditional architecture went quietly from the establishment into the dog house in just a few short postwar years. The key was the idea that Hitler "chose" traditional architecture over modern architecture, so, with that in mind, any right-thinking postwar intellectual had to bow down in thrall to the modernists, which they did. Yet it was not really a choice but a decision to accept established design going back hundreds of years over a new architecture of experimentation. But even under the Nazis, modernism was deemed acceptable for factories and other utilitarian buildings. Stevens Curl shows how perfectly sinister this transformation was - and explains its ties to corporate profits, General Motors, MoMA and the CIA. As he demonstrates conclusively, none of it made any sense at all, and yet we now live in the dystopias caused by the world elite's devious embrace of modern architecture - even as the masses continue to hate it, as they have since it first emerged after WWI. Democracy indeed!

Other books have bashed modernism to pieces, including Henry Reed's masterpiece but also Tom Wolfe's "From Bauhaus to Our House," Roger Scruton's "The Classical Vernacular," and Malcolm Millais's "Exploding the Myths of Modern Architecture" and "Le Corbusier: The Dishonest Architect," a host of books on the neuroscience of architecture by Nikos Salingaros, and many others books since the failed postmodernist challenge to modernism. To date these books have proved incapable of dethroning the reign of modern architecture. Stevens Curl's "Dystopia" comes closer than any to telling the full story of not only why modern architecture is a gargantuan mistake, but also the reason this horrifying error has managed to maintain control of architecture's establishment for more than half a century.

There is an erudite anger to Stevens Curl's prose that speaks truth to power. He is a brave man, and the long knives are out for him among the usual suspects of the British design commentariat. Nevertheless, many who have not drunk the Kool Aid will read the book and experience the feeling of scales dropping suddenly from their eyes - even though the reality the author describes is hiding in plain sight.

I have reviewed his book at length on my blog Architecture Here and There. "Making Dystopia" has many fine lines that should place it atop bestseller lists around the world. One of my favorites: "A great language capable of infinite variety of expression, a mighty and expansive vocabulary, a vast resource based on two and a half millennia or more of civilization, was superseded by a series of monosyllabic grunts, foisted on the populace with a totalitarian disregard for the opinions of those who had not been drilled to conform.”

If this book gets the attention it deserves, it will start a revolution in the way we shape our built environment, and the result will be as vital as the discovery by mankind that the natural environment is in equal peril. It will rank with civilization's victories in defeating totalitarianism and bringing democracy to Germany and Japan after WWII, and to Eastern Europe after the defeat of the Soviet Union in the Cold War. Some will dismiss that, but the eradication of beauty from the intensely visual field of architecture - the queen of the arts - which we all must experience every day and have since childhood, has had a major saddening effect on the world, and its reversal will bring about an efflorescence of happiness. It's possible that James Stevens Curl's book will launch that revolution. - David Brussat
"När bomberna fallit över Stockholm. Våren 1969."

Ja, bombene har sannelig falt over Lena også.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kapping av hulkillist

Hadde nesten ferdig et hjørne med hulkillister i dag, men så fikk jeg somlet meg til å kappe 2 mm for mye. Da var dagen over og rett hjem og helga ødelagt! Men får tro jeg får en ny dag i mårå? Har funnet litt på nett, så går på med fornyet optimisme over helga. Får trøste meg med at skal man bli god i noe må man minst holde på 10.000 timer.




En god artikkel:
5 snarveier når du skal legge lister
En kommentar: Kort sagt må man tenke motsatt når man lister med hulkil. Se for deg at du legger lista feil vei (den som peker mot/tar i taket) legger du jevnt med underlaget på sagen. Den delen som skal på veggen legger du på anlegget/landet på sagen.  Skjær den første vinkelen du trenger. Så maler du deg ut ifra den, setter merke på den delen som ligger på anlegget/landet på sagen, vrir saga til den vinkelen du skal ha... skjærer forsiktig litt og litt av til du treffer streken...

Så bare til å montere :)

Lite tips er å kappe hulkil lister 1-2 mm for kort, slik at du har litt plass å bevege lis…

Tårevandringer III

The original form of Anglo-American conservatism, that of Edmund Burke, explains why the current situation is bad and why we should have avoided it. It tells us that society is extremely complex, it can’t be designed or reduced to a single principle like equal freedom, and it takes a long time to evolve, so if you have a reasonably functional society you shouldn’t wreck it, and if you’ve unsettled an inherited social order you should step back and do what you can so it can re-establish itself. It’s hard to see how any of that can apply in an age of institutionalized revolution symbolized, for example, by an ever more radical and sacralized principle of inclusiveness. - James Kalb- Why Liberal Governing Elites Seek to Neutralize Social Issues

Selv orker jeg ikke lenger å leve mitt liv begrenset til den sosiale kontrakt, det burde være klart for alle nå at vi kan ikke leve sammen slik, og at vi må reetablere husmannstroens kontrakt, den Klaus, Even Helmer og Johan Albert hadde som fund…

From Ideology to Technology

Michael Mehaffy and Nikos Salingaros are running a series of essays in Metropolis Magazine at the moment, they are all published here. I’ve no idea how long the series will run — hopefully forever. Anyway, it’s time to introduce this series to permaculture people, and I’ll be concentrating on the first five essays about the technologies of Christopher Alexander.

The essays on Alexander’s technologies in chronological order:
The Radical Technology of Christopher AlexanderThe Sustainable Technology of Christopher AlexanderThe Pattern Technology of Christopher AlexanderThe Living Technology of Christopher AlexanderThe “Wholeness-Generating” Technology of Christopher Alexander
The 20th century was the century of ideologies, but it all ended in mindless consumerism. So obviously, ideologies alone are not the answer, although they can hold many a truth and be a tool to unite people behind a common endeavour. Still, all this is pointless if the people do not have the right tools, or even worse…