Skip to main content

The Man Who Started a Fire (Christopher Alexander Lecture at Berkeley, California)



Jump to 12:20 to skip introductions

As said in the introduction to this lecture held in spring 2011, Christopher Alexander has started a fire that keeps on burning, spread by the ‘wind’ throughout the world. But in the wake of this fire there’s no ash, but only beauty and true living structure. As in the new cosmology of Alexander, matter is not inert anymore — it has spirit, revealed in the field of centers. This means that beauty is seen as a fact of the wholeness found in nature and the universe.
Beauty is the manifestation of secret natural laws, which otherwise would have been hidden from us forever. — Goethe
These natural laws are not so secret anymore. Though Alexander in the beginning of his lecture says he has only taken the first initial steps toward our understanding of living structure, I believe in the end it will turn out that these steps were gigantic. If we survive as a civilization, something we can only do if we start creating living structures, not as something added on, but as the very core of a new civilization where nature and culture are one.

The field of centers revealed. Photo: Derek Ramsey

You never hear about Christopher Alexander in quiz-shows on TV, in spite of that A Pattern Language probably is the most sold book on architecture ever. This is because this book and his research questions, and even goes directly against, the power-structures of our world. Some have tried to ridicule him, but this is of course impossible, so the main strategy is to silence him. This is illustrated by a story Alexander tells, where the construction industry offered the management of the Eishin Campus $80,000 in a bag if they could get him out of Japan.

When the arch modernist Le Corbusier died his death was regarded as a great loss for both capitalist and socialist leaders:
Such views made Le Corbusier a natural ally of the masters of the modern world. He wanted to turn everything into a rational machine, and a rational machine is easy for those in power to understand and control. When he died in 1965, the Soviets said, “modern architecture has lost its greatest master,” while President Johnson commented, “his influence was universal and his works are invested with a permanent quality possessed by those of very few artists in our history.” Leonid Brezhnev and Lyndon Johnson may not have known much about art, but they knew what they had reason to like. — James Kalb
While Le Corbusier is the architect of the modern power structure, loved by the elites, who use their whole apparatus of power to enforce their desires on the masses, Christopher Alexander is the architect of the people:
My conclusion is that careful construction of the world, according to the principle that every center is made to be related to the true I of the maker, will result in a world which is practical, harmonious, functional. If this is true, astonishingly then, it would appear that the safest road to the creation of living structure is one in which people do what is most nearly in their hearts: that they make each part in such a way that it reflects their true feeling, in such a way that it makes them feel wholesome in themselves and is, in this sense, related in the deepest way to their own true I.

For someone educated in the 20th-century way of looking at the world, this is enigmatic, if not ridiculous. It means that a world constructed in the most personal and individual fashion, made by people who are searching deeply to follow the nature of their own true I, their own true selves, will be – in the most public, objective, and universal sense – a world which is functional, adequate and harmonious.

The enigma which arises, then, is that the process by which human beings create the world in their own image, gradually creates a living world, and this is – apparently – the best, and most efficient way in which a living world can be created. Of course, the phrase "in their own image" requires that it be the true self they are looking for; and implies that this larger process of building the world cannot be separated from each person’s personal search for the true self. — Christopher Alexander, The Luminous Ground, page 142
Surely, Alexander is the architect of the coming realm of the commons!

I’m happy to share that a new book by Alexander is to be published in October. Here is the Amazon.com description of The Battle for the Life and Beauty of the Earth: A Struggle between Two World-Systems:
The purpose of all architecture, writes Christopher Alexander, is to encourage and support life-giving activity, dreams, and playfulness. But in recent decades, while our buildings are technically better — more sturdy, more waterproof, more energy efficient — they have also became progressively more sterile, rarely providing the kind of environment in which people are emotionally nourished, genuinely happy, and deeply contented. 
Using the example of his building of the Eishin Campus in Japan, Christopher Alexander and his collaborators reveal an ongoing dispute between two fundamentally different ways of shaping our world. One system places emphasis on subtleties, on finesse, on the structure of adaptation that makes each tiny part fit into the larger context. The other system is concerned with efficiency, with money, power and control, stressing the more gross aspects of size, speed, and profit. This second, "business-as-usual" system, Alexander argues, is incapable of creating the kind of environment that is able to genuinely support the emotional, whole-making side of human life. To confront this sterile system, the book presents a new architecture that we — both as a world-wide civilization, and as individual people and cultures — can create, using new processes that allow us to build places of human energy and beauty. The book outlines nine ways of working, each one fully dedicated to wholeness, and able to support day-to-day activities that will make planning, design and construction possible in an entirely new way, and in more humane ways.
See the lecture, read the book, and let’s create a new kind of world. A world full of living structure!

This article is published at The Permaculture Research Institute of Australia on September 11, 2012. Republished at Energy Bulletin, USA, on September 19, 2012. Republished at the P2P-blog on December 10, 2012.

One more lecture and a documentary about Chris


Comments

  1. My comment to an article in Garden Visit:

    http://www.gardenvisit.com/blog/2011/11/24/christopher-alexander-and-humphry-repton-as-landscape-design-theorists-udg-lecture/

    As a landscape designer you should not bother that Alexander speaks too "slow" on his old ages. You remember the ents in Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings, these tree-like creatures spoke extremely slowly. Of course, as they were like trees they were not in any hurry. Alexander has become like a gigantic tree now, like Yggdrasil, the ancient mythological ash of the Viking mythology, stretching its branches throughout the world.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Oyvind
    we are launching a postgraduate course builds on Christopher Alexander’s approach
    My Researchgate's page you can find a paper that describe it (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309188068_The_Timeless_Way_of_Educating_Architects_A_New_Master_in_Building_Beauty_in_Naples_Italy)

    Alternatively, contact me e.mail at antoniocaperna@gmail.com
    Best
    Antonio

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kapping av hulkillist

Hadde nesten ferdig et hjørne med hulkillister i dag, men så fikk jeg somlet meg til å kappe 2 mm for mye. Da var dagen over og rett hjem og helga ødelagt! Men får tro jeg får en ny dag i mårå? Har funnet litt på nett, så går på med fornyet optimisme over helga. Får trøste meg med at skal man bli god i noe må man minst holde på 10.000 timer.




En god artikkel:
5 snarveier når du skal legge lister
En kommentar: Kort sagt må man tenke motsatt når man lister med hulkil. Se for deg at du legger lista feil vei (den som peker mot/tar i taket) legger du jevnt med underlaget på sagen. Den delen som skal på veggen legger du på anlegget/landet på sagen.  Skjær den første vinkelen du trenger. Så maler du deg ut ifra den, setter merke på den delen som ligger på anlegget/landet på sagen, vrir saga til den vinkelen du skal ha... skjærer forsiktig litt og litt av til du treffer streken...

Så bare til å montere :)

Lite tips er å kappe hulkil lister 1-2 mm for kort, slik at du har litt plass å bevege lis…

Paddehoa og plassen min

Kjære plassen min, kvalt du vart, lik ei paddehoe alle paddehannane kasta seg over i dammen om våren.
Dei ville alle bu ved dine grøne enger, då dei tykte det her var so vent og fredeleg. Men dei vørde deg ikkje, og no er du kvalt til daude.
Herr Fossemøllens augnestein stend utan låven sin, her gjeng ikkje lenger dyr og beitar i dine grøne enger. Berre grasklipparar beitar her no.
Dei elska deg til daude, og med deg i grava di tok du den rike
grendearven din.
No stend vi ribba attende.

Minus låven

Det er de som hevder at etterkrigstida har vært fremskrittets tid. Knut Hamsun ville vært sterkt uenig i et slikt syn. Fordi som han formulerte det: "Fremskritt, det er menneskets trivsel." En forutsetning for trivsel er den menneskelige skala, som aller best kan illustreres med totenarden til tippoldefaren min. Pumpehuset ved Grythengen er helt ute av den menneskelig skala, hvor man pumper vann fra Mjøsas dyp opp til toppen av grenda som var himmelporten til Totenåsen. Brønnen som lå her før var i den menneskelige skala, en teknologi så liten at man kunne holde den i hånda. På samme vis som sæterstien mellom Holmstadsveen og Hongsætra var i den menneskelige skala, nå er den i maskinskala, eller nærmere bestemt tråkkemaskinskala.
Tvert imot kan vi slå fast at fremskrittet har forduftet, da trivselen ble borte med at stoltheten forsvant. Fordi uten den menneskelige skala finnes ingen stolthet, da det kun er maskinen som kan spille denne skalaen. Ikke kulturbæreren eller hist…